kcondon wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 6:17 pm
The stump is heavily detailed in the original reference photo. Would you expect the stump to be very detailed in this drawing, or should I dial-down the level of detail because it will compete too much with the raven?
KATHY-Raven.jpg
I think you've got it about right. Ultimately, you're not trying to depict reality, you're telling a story. In this case, your story might be as simple as wanting to display what you see as the beauty of a Raven to viewers of your drawing. Heavy detail of the stump is not going to ADD anything to the story, and will probably compete with the Raven for attention. My personal rule is "If it doesn't add to the story, omit it", or at least minimise it. For example, your Raven has no background. Good decision! What extra information could its inclusion add?
2) Value of the stump
Do you think the stump should as dark as the bird -- or would you draw it more lightly so it doesn't distract from the main subject? What's the best thing to do for balancing the overall drawing?
OK, let's try that...
KATHY-Raven2.jpg
Sometimes, bottom weight can help balance the drawing. But here, I think it simply demotes the Raven from BIG BLACK BIRD to something rather mundane and no darker than a post.
3) Finishing the bottom
Since I'm not drawing the complete stump, how should I finish off the bottom?
Should I "fade out" the bottom of the stump with irregular lines, or would you make the lines end all at the same point (such as a straight line at roughly the bottom of his tail feathers)?
Actually, that's am important question, and not, I think, one easily answered. My first reaction was to have a downward-curving base that faded out. That's because the post is cylindrical, and a flat/straight base doesn't look quite right... But now I'm undecided. So I played around with it. I was aiming for a
suggestion of curve without it being a distraction. Then I notched it slightly at the right, because the curve was too regular, which attracted unwanted attention. And then I finally faded it very gently, because I found any sense of it actually ending just created a distraction. Personally, I'd gently stroke that bottom edge with Blu-Tack and
very gradually lighten it, because that's easier than trying to draw the fade out.
KATHY-Raven3.jpg
I think that works now - just my personal opinion - because the base of the post doesn't attract my attention at all, but it does feed my eye up to the hard edge of the top. And that in turn introduces me to the Raven.
I'd welcome any feedback on how to improve the drawing in general, too. After all, it's been a while!
I think it's superb. And a little over-detailed. But that will occur at some stage. It's just my impression, but I think everyone goes through the "Detail is King" stage - and HAS TO - before you can begin to divide necessary from unnecessary, and focus on the former.
Finally, I suggest you try what I was just doing - manipulate a photo to discover what works and what doesn't
non-destructively. Instances like this are partly why the current videos are exploring the uses of Affinity Photo.
KATHY-Raven3.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.